Explain the reasons for u. s. neutrality during the 1920s and 1930s. how did ideas about neutrality change during the period from the end of world war i to the passage of the lend-lease act? be sure to include any events, terms, or people that may support your response. i need 1 paragraph

The United States decided to stay neutral in the 1920’s and 1930’s.

The reason for the United States decision was because they wanted to stay

as an isolationist country. The United States did not want to be a part of other

nations affairs. Instead they wanted to focus on their own problems. They

also did not want to be a part of the war. In the beginning the ideas about

neutrality started to change when President Roosevelt wanted to support

China. He did not want to follow the Neutrality Acts. The President decided to

use the Cash-and-Carry system. He believed that helping democratic

governments was way more important than keeping the U.S neutral. We start

to see the ideas about neutrality alter when Roosevelt signed the Lend-Lease

Act. This authorized Roosevelt to sell arms or protective aid to other nations

without them having to pay in cash.

Explanation:

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

i believe it to be a democracy