Which of the following presents one of andrew johnson's strengths and one of his weaknesses? a. he was loyal to the union. / he was stubborn and uncompromising. b. he was a northerner. / he treated former rebels badly. c. he was highly educated. / he had once been a slave. d. he was loyal to the confederacy. / he was a coward

nope its really A. He was loyal to the Union. / He was stubborn and uncompromising.  my human fella fellow human take my word i chose A and it was right

A. He was loyal to the Union. / He was stubborn and uncompromising.

Explanation:

Andrew Johnson was independent, which made him a solid character. Johnson was a man of parts; he was insightful, capable, forceful, and talented with genuineness. He was likewise unflinchingly committed to obligation and to the general population; he was a one sided victor of states' rights and the Constitution.

Despite the fact that these qualities served him well, he had numerous shortcomings. He was a nonconformist; a Southerner who did not comprehend the North, a Tennessean who had earned the distrust of the South, a Democrat who had never been acknowledged by the Republicans, a president who had never been chosen to the workplace, he was not at home. Impetuous, antagonistic, and stubborn, he was the wrong man in the wrong place at the wrong time; a reconstruction policy devised by angels may have failed in his hands.

yes based on alexanders actions he deserved the title of "the great". his empire covered about 3,000 miles and he was able to establish the empire over a 13 year period of time. he was able to conquer many different places. he also defeated the persians. he conquered egypt and developed a city and named it after himself.

they both wanted to stop protestantism, they felt a call in life and it was to strengthen the church. charles used inquisition, philip used army's, charles gave control to outsiders, philip centralized all power.

hope this you !