Which argument did the senators who opposed joining the league of nations make? european powers would combine to dominate the league’s agenda. other members of the league were enemies of the united states. the league would not have its own independent source of income. membership in the league could draw the united states into future wars.

The answer is option 4: Membership in the League could draw the United States into future wars.

Being part of the League of Nations meant being part of an intergovernmental organization aiming to prevent future wars by uniting nations that would not fight each other. It intended to achieve this through collective security as well as disarmament and by settling international disputes through negotiation and arbitration, among others.

However, it also meant that if any outside country ever attacked any member of the League of Nations, the other member nations would defend, protect and fight on behalf of the attacked country. The American senators were aware of this, and after the devastation of the World War I (1914-18), most Americans were sure they didn't want to involve in any foreign affairs that weren't aligned with their domestic interests and decided to return to their Isolationist policy instead.

the book of ezekiel takes its title from the priest of the same name, son to a man named buzi. ezekiel’s priestly lineage shines through in his prophetic ministry; he often concerned himself with topics such as the temple, the priesthood, the glory of the lord, and the sacrificial system.

explanation: mark brainliesrt i am trying to get to the next level                                                                                                       i will be your freind and

the correct answer is:   the domino theory states that if one country in a region came under the influence of communism, then the surrounding countries would follow in a domino effect.