Does the "clear and present danger" test represent a reasonable means of balancing free speech and national security? Why. l or Why not? Explain your reasoning.

Yes.

Explanation:

The government shouldn't over react to baseless threats.

powers  are  denied  to the  national governmentin three distinct ways: some  powers, such as the  power  to levy duties on exports or prohibit the freedom of religion, speech, press, or assembly, are expressly  denied  to the  national government  in the  constitution.