How did Marcus Garvey's approach to civil rights differ from that of the NAACP?

A. Garvey felt that the Harlem Renaissance would persuade whitepeople to fight for civil rights, while the NAACP did not think art
would make a difference.

B. Garvey felt Black people should form their own nation where
they were full citizens, while the NAACP focused on fighting for
equal rights in the United States.

C. Garvey believed that a legal strategy was the best way to
achieve equality for all, while the NAACP did not believe
equality was possible.

D. Garvey believed that Black culture would persuade white
people to accept equality, while the NAACP used a legal
strategy to achieve equality.

why you doin this to your self

after the civil war, and with the termination of slavery, the south was faced with a big problem; what was supposed to happen and how they were supposed to deal with the freedom and the rights that black people and freed slaves had gained as a result of the north defeating the south and forcing the end of slavery. first, most, if not all, of the workforce of the south came from slaves and they did not have an option to replace the loss of said workforce. second, particularly in the south, people were convinced that black people were lesser, less intelligent, less capable and less smart than whites. this posed a huge problem for them. also, southerners were faced with another issue; freed slaves now had a say in how their lives would be lived and the right to politically choose the way they would be governed. people in the south did not want to accept this, none of this and this opposition and the conflicts that arose from it, not to mention the afereffects of the war, forced the congress of the time to enact and enforce the reconstruction plans that had been proposed by president andrew johnson.

explanation:

the president, prime minister, chief justice, speakers and ministers take their oath of office. the oath is taken in bengali