Answer all of the following questions

1. What was the purpose of the Missouri Compromise?

to allow new states to decide whether they would ban enslavement

to set rules for immigration into the United States

to encourage the North and the South to have separate economies

to maintain an equal number of senators from the North and the South



2. What resulted from the Missouri Compromise?

The arguments involving enslaved people were solved.

The balance between slave states and free states was broken.

Maine was admitted to the Union as a free state.

Enslavement was banned in all of the Louisiana Purchase territory.



3. What happened in the election of 1828?

Jackson ran against Adams and was elected president.

The Whig Party won the presidency for the first time.

The election was decided by the House of Representatives.

Adams defeated Jackson due to a corrupt bargain with Clay.



4. What did Andrew Jackson do as president?

He banned enslavement in new states.

He authorized the creation of the Second Bank of the United States.

He passed a law allowing him to use federal troops against states.

He opposed the Tariff of 1828, making southern farmers happy.



5. Which belief was held by most supporters of Jacksonian Democracy?

Native Americans should be given back their land.

White women should have the right to vote.

Enslavement is immoral and should be banned.

White men who own no property should have the right to vote.

1. What was the purpose of the Missouri Compromise?

2. What resulted from the Missouri Compromise?

3. What happened in the election of 1828?

4. What did Andrew Jackson do as president?

5. Which belief was held by most supporters of Jacksonian Democracy?

Explanation:

#CarryonLearning

1.) to maintain an equal number of senators from the North and the South

2.) Maine was admitted to the Union as a free state.

3.) Jackson ran against Adams and was elected president.

4.) He passed a law allowing him to use federal troops against states.

5.) Enslavement is immoral and should be banned.

porter is writing economic history because he is focusing on the cost of developing vaccines.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!