Connect the views/perspectives with each group: Question 2 options:

"My husband doesn't need to become a soldier for anyone because we don't have means to do so"

"Why can't we just be one united country?"

"Why don't people just stand for the Mother Country?"

1.

Loyalists

2.

Neutralists

3.

Patriots

your answer will most likely be a.

is this question from a book? ?

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

the northwest ordinance of 1787 guaranteed basic rights for settlers and banned slavery there.