The principal-agent relationship between a group of voters and their representative can sometimes be imperfect. More to the point, a representative could decide to go against the wishes of voters on a regular basis. Why is this an inherent risk of the relationship?

The interests of the agent and the principal may not be well aligned.

Principals can force agents to do things against their will so much that the agents rebel.

Agents and principals in this relationship can both be irrational at times.

Voters are often ignorant about the ins and outs of major issues, giving representatives the moral duty to decide for them.

the united states didn't wanted to get involve with other countries probelms

the decreasing neutrality of the u. s. in world war i

hope this : )

because everyone tends to get their feelings hurt if they don't agree with something someone is doing and vice versa. it's a major issue that needs to be dealt with, especially in the christian society. everyone thinks that christians hate gay people, because it is a sin, and christians "just hate everyone who sins and every one is going to hell for sinning"(saying that all in a sarcastic tone but i'm just going to go ahead and tell you why everything with that type of view on christians is wrong.

#1. christians do not hate gay people. and if they do, then that is their own personal problem. christians are not supposed to hate anyone. if you hate a neighbor (or any person basically), then that is as if you are hating jesus.

#2. being gay is in fact a sin according to the holy bible. it is in genesis. and no, the fact that it is a sin, does not mean that god hates you. he is grieved that a person is sinning against his word, but he still loves that person. in fact, christians are supposed to love everyone. we are supposed to love our enemies, but hate the sin they are doing. we love you and respect you, but we do not agree with every decision you make, is basically what i'm trying to say.

hope this you ! (:

no

explanation: