Why a stable civilization is more likely to have a golden age than an unstable civilization.

stable civilizations most of the time don't need to worry about things like poverty, or sickness. those are things unstable civilizations do need to worry about. When a civilization is stable, they have more time on their hands to create innovations and work. Meanwhile unstable civilizations will need to be worrying about all the things they need to fix.

Explanation:

Good luck :)

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.

there are no answer given

explanation: