Which evidence supports the theme that people are sometimes judged by their gender instead of their actions? Question 5 options:

"Everyone was fully armed, and all expected to have fine sport hunting the terrible beast."

"She preferred the freedom of the green woods to all the luxuries she might have enjoyed in a palace."

"The men gasped. They had never heard of such a thing as a girl going out with heroes to hunt wild boars."

"So she slowed her steps, and let him reach the riverbank first."

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this

answer; (b) asia;

they chose sides following the death of the islamic prophet muhammad in ad 632. a dispute over succession to islamic prophet muhammad as a caliph of the islamic community spread across various parts of the world, which led to the battle of jamal and battle of siffin.

hope it

examples that illustrates limits on texas governor´s power are: it can remove only its own appointees; the judiciary is elected; needs senatorial confirmation.