A) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno and Easley v. Cromartie. b) Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts elucidated in Easley v. Cromartie might have led to a different holding than the holding in Shaw v. Reno (Hint: think politics in Easly and race in Shaw as predominant factors in drawing district lines and violation of the Equal Protection clause).

c) Describe an action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in Easley v. Cromartie could take to limit its impact (hint: if you think there was a racial focus, what could you do to limit the impact of the decision? protest, campaign contributions, voting, elections, support interest groups, political parties, public media campaign, lawsuits, new SC justices, constitutional amendment for redistricting, etc)

Explanation: The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. ... Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.

a. the astrolabe could determine the correct latitudinal location of the ship

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.