A) From 1981 to 2016, which opposition Congress was most willing to confirm the president’s appointees, and who was the president? Which opposition was the least willing, and who was the president? b) Identify a consequence of an oppositional president and Senate, and draw a conclusion therefrom.

c) Discuss the principles of the separation of powers based on your answer to part B.

This is a free response pls help

Which statement in the passage best reflects sumer's opinion of the dred scott decision? a."i speak what cannot be denied." b."[the] judgment was sustained by a falsification of history." b."the opinion was more thoroughly abominable than anything history." i speak what cannot be denied when i declare that the opinion of the chief justice in the case of dred scott was more thoroughly abominable than anything of the kind in the history of courts. judicial baseness reached its lowest point on that occasion. you have not forgotten that terrible decision where a most unrighteous judgment was sustained by a falsification of history. -charles sumner, 1865