When evaluating past eras, historians depend on primary documents and other resources to understand events and cultures. For instance, it would be difficult to
evaluate why people once thought Earth was at the center of the solar system
unless you analyzed documents from the fime in which the idea was relevant.
What difficulties do you think might arise when trying to understand ideas from the
past, especially when those ideas are so different from our modern thinking? Do
you think primary resources show a complete picture of the period they are from?
Give an example or two to illustrate your answer.

the crusades are one of the most significant events in the history of europe and the middle east.   they were a series of religious wars carried out by christian crusaders from europe during the timeframe of the middle ages.   beginning in 1095 ce, the crusades saw european knights and noblemen travel to the middle east in an attempt to capture the holy land away from muslim people that had controlled the region for the previous centuries.   the term crusade means ‘cross’.   therefore, the europeans that became crusaders viewed themselves as ‘taking up the cross’.   in fact, many of the crusaders wore crosses on their clothing and armor as they made their pilgrimage to the holy land.

explanation:

after the roman empire, the catholic church began to unify by taking on many duties of a government.

d. hip hop

it was originated in the 70s while the harlem renaissance occured in the 1920s

explanation:

id do!