subject
History, 08.09.2021 20:40 zurfluhe

What do historians do when they evaluate a source of information about the past? They find additional information about the event mentioned in the source.
They ask other social scientists about the accuracy of the source’s information.
They compare evidence in one source to evidence in another source.
all of the above

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
Why did some states believe they had the power to overturn federal laws?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
“well,” he says, “there’s excuse for picks and letting-on, in a case like this; if it warn’t so, i wouldn’t approve of it, nor i wouldn’t stand by and see the rules broke—because right is right, and wrong is wrong, and a body ain’t got no business doing wrong when he ain’t ignorant and knows better. it might answer for you to dig jim out with a pick, without any letting-on, because you don’t know no better; but it wouldn’t for me, because i do know better.” the meaning in this excerpt is
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
Why did william blackstone believe that parliament was important?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
Which of these was the main reason for the berlin conference? ending african civil wars spreading the christian faith economic benefits for europe new markets for european goods
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
What do historians do when they evaluate a source of information about the past? They find additio...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 31.08.2019 17:30
question
Mathematics, 31.08.2019 17:30
question
Mathematics, 31.08.2019 17:30
question
Mathematics, 31.08.2019 17:30
question
Mathematics, 31.08.2019 17:30
Questions on the website: 13722367