I CAN explain how questioning a piece of evidence (“Sourcing”) is important in determining if the evidence is trustworthy. The following are good questions to ask if your are...

Are facts supported with evidence? Can the same information be found in another source? Is the source creator reputable, or does he or she have credentials (education or titles) that suggest credibility? Does the speaker or author acknowledge other viewpoints?

the virginia plan called for three branches of government and two houses of congress. representation in each house would be determined by population. the new jersey plan called for three branches of government and a single house of congress. each state would have an equal vote.

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this

theodore roosevelt 26th u.s. president : i admire his energy and passion. he was a fundamentally good man, brilliantly intelligent, possessed of extraordinary will and ability, supremely self-confident, bold, egalitarian, idealistic…. , lord, can we have him back?

your wrong i made a 2.34 out of 4 the answers are 1st qeustion all of them are correct. question 2 the han emperors chose smart, victorious men to work in the government. question 3 during the han dinasty, the teaching in the analects of confucius set the tone for public life. question 4 on a and b are correct.