In Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled on whether police could tap a
public phone without a warrant. Identify one way in which the case is legally
significant.
O A. It led to new laws on who could issue warrants.
• B. It established the idea of a reasonable expectation of privacy.
• C. It determined the legal status of phone booths.
O D. It increased the power of the Supreme Court.
N
SUBMIT

The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.

answer; taking up arms to defend the nation;

aug 15, 2012 - although van leeuwenhoek was not the inventor of the microscope, he advanced it more he loved to grind and focus a new lens in order to see the unseen world. most of leeuwenhoek's microscopes were silver. in a simple but significant experiment (1668), he demonstrated that worms found on