subject
History, 13.07.2021 19:50 anthonysutton82

Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for historians? a. they can summarize a huge amount of data that a historian could not sort through alone.
b. they can help a historian focus on important themes rather than on a specific piece of evidence.
c. they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted.
d. they can compare and contrast conclusions other historians have made about a time period.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
What is institutional discrimination in the social work field
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
Which sentence best compares the employment opportunities between farms and cities in the late 1800s
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:30
The case of brown v. board of education was started when a. oliver brown's daughter had to walk 21 blocks to the nearest school when an all-white school was only 7 blocks away. b. oliver brown's son was caught at a sit-in at the local school district. c. oliver brown's son was unable to participate in the school's all-white football team. d. oliver brown's daughter was unable to attend high school because there were none for her to attend.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:00
Why does polonius say that he will spy on hamlets conversation with his mother?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for histor...
Questions
question
History, 11.11.2019 19:31
Questions on the website: 13722367