subject
History, 29.06.2021 19:00 dustin112000

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of its primary source when analyzing a historical event? To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event.​

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:30
How does the process of constructing a historical narrative differ from the process of creating a timeline
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
How is the president involved in the process of bills becoming laws?
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
What was the difference between bombing military targets in the united kingdom, and bombing the city of london? a. bombing a city kills lots of innocent civilians, bombing a military target doesn't b. bombing military targets didn't force the u.k. to surrender, but bombing london did c. military targets were bombed by japan, while london was bombed by the nazis d. london was bombed before the u.s. entered the war; military targets were bombed afterward
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
What was a major failing of the united states under the articles of confederation?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of its primary source when analyzing a histori...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363