What is the relationship between historical questions and historical arguments?

A historical argument is An argument is a set of propositions designed to demonstrate that a particular conclusion, called the thesis, is true. An argument is not simply a statement of opinion, but an attempt to give reasons for holding certain opinions.

And a historical question is like this. Those who seek to understand the past must formulate questions about the past, and answer those questions based on historical evidence. Now, let's review our key terms. The scientific method guides historians in understanding the past. The scientific method is is a process of investigation used to arrive at a truth.

So if you read threw these 2, you should be able to find the relationship. I really hope this helps and good luck on the quiz or test you are taking.

(. ❛ ᴗ ❛.)

Explanation:

executive, (president and about 5,000,000 workers) legislative (senate and house of representatives) and judicial (supreme court and lower courts)

explanation:

i believe the answer is:

-   william jennings bryan is a democrat while mckinley was a republican

at that time, the segment of population that choose for democratic party were the voters with low economic background and vice versa

- william jennings has support of populists and wants to have inflation to farmers while mckinley has support of bankers and businessmen , doesn't want inflation

the fixed value of gold make the large business able to stack up their gold without   being worried that it would devaluated.

- william jennings supported the silver standard while mckinley supported the gold standard

according to jenning, using other metal beside gold could the poor people to have more purchasing power and them advance in the society.