What does the Supreme Court ruling about "Separate but Equal" mean? Black individuals are not citizens and therefore do not have equal rights
Black individuals are not citizens and therefore do not have equal rights

Separate facilities for white and black people was constitutional as long as the facilities were equal
Separate facilities for white and black people was constitutional as long as the facilities were equal

The 14th amendment was unconstitutional
The 14th amendment was unconstitutional

Separate public facilities for white and black people was unconstitutiona no links please hel me

separate but equal was a legal doctrine in United States constitutional law, according to which racial segregated did not necessarily violate for fourteen Amendment to the United States constitution, which guaranteed equal protection under the law to all people.

britain's king george iii, however, refused to receive the petition, which, written we consider whom we must oppose in this contest, and if it continues, what may the fundamental grounds upon which americans were taking up arms had shifted. that king george refused to so much as receive the

no statements but ok.

the statement that best describes the idea of manifest destiny that was used in the 19th century would be that "it was fate that the united states would continue to  expand westward," since people thought the us was "destined" to do so.