Can someone please rewrite this assignment to make it sound better please and thank you No preliminaries by jury:

As of late one of my companions got captured for something she didn't do, the police cross-examined her and thought she was lying when she said she didn't do it. Rather than giving her a preliminary by jury, in light of one individual's nature, she was condemned to jail. Not having a preliminary by jury is unreasonable in light of the fact that her decision and her destiny are just controlled by a couple of individuals' impulses. A preliminary by jury gives numerous individuals from the local area to ponder and examine if she is liable and what her sentence ought to be.

Henry h. amringe commented in reaction to the 1850 women’s rights convention. women in europe may fill the throne, as reigning monarchs. shall they who are thought worthy of the highest station, in hereditary monarchies, be deemed unworthy of election to office, by the suffrages of a free people? if women, placed in the administration of great and vast national affairs, by the mere accident of birth, have acted wisely, much more might we expect not wisdom only, but integrity in the government of women, selected by free citizens, with a view to mental and moral fitness. short-answer questions where did henry amringe make these comments? what argument does amringe give to support his views?