subject
History, 25.05.2021 01:00 KillerSteamcar

Refer to the passage. "Fifty years ago, somewhere in the Carpathian Mountains, a young Jewish woman read in a Hungarian newspaper a brief account about the Warsaw ghetto uprising. Astonished, dismayed, she wondered aloud, ‘Why,’ she said, ‘are our Jewish brothers doing that? Why are they fighting? Couldn’t they wait quietly’—the word was quietly—until the end of the war?’ Treblinka, Ponar, Bełżec, Chełmno, Birkenau. She had never heard of these places. One year later, together with her entire family, she was already in a cattle car traveling to the black hole in time, the black hole in history, named Auschwitz.

But Mr. President and distinguished guests, these names and others were known to officials in Washington, and London, and Moscow, and Stockholm, and Geneva, and the Vatican. After all, by April 1943, nearly 4 million Jews from surrounding countries had already vanished, had already perished. The Pentagon knew, the State Department knew, the White House knew, most governments knew. Only the victims did not know. Thus the painful, disturbing question—why weren’t Hungarian Jews in 1944—they were then the last remnant of Eastern European Jewry, why were they not even warned of the impending doom?"

Elie Wiesel, author and Holocaust survivor, making a speech to commemorate the opening of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, 1993

Which of the following actions of the international community after the Second World War best addresses Wiesel's concerns in the passage?

The Nuremberg Trials brought many Nazis to justice.
The United Nations established peacekeeping forces.
European countries banned Nazi symbols and writings.
Allied nations made Germany pay reparations to Israel.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:00
How did southern states respond to the ratification of the fourteenth amendment?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
In 1944, the supreme court upheld the authority of the u.s. government to order the internment of a minority group in the interest of national security, even though there was no evidence that any members of this group were disloyal to the united states. should the same policy be applied today against u.s. muslims or muslim immigrants? why or why not? are these forms of internment different from native reservations? if so how? if not, why?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
What types of subjects did public high schools in the 1900s emphasize and why
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:10
Yes the notes gathered in your research to answer the following questions
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Refer to the passage. "Fifty years ago, somewhere in the Carpathian Mountains, a young Jewish woman...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 08.09.2021 06:40
question
Mathematics, 08.09.2021 06:40
question
Mathematics, 08.09.2021 06:40
question
English, 08.09.2021 06:40
question
Mathematics, 08.09.2021 06:40
Questions on the website: 13722362