List three historical issues that have been used to debate the different interpretations of the Constitution. Then choose one of those issues to describe in detail. In a four- to five-paragraph essay, use the text of the Constitution, your notes, your own interpretation, the resources provided below, and any additional research to explain how the issue supports either loose constructionism or originalism. (do not give the textbook answer, it's not helpful.)

i believe 5 is correct answer

depends on the age of the teen, many believe by the age of 16 a person should know the strong difference between right and wrong along with the difference between risky and immediate death. swimming with sharks might be dangerous but swimming with sharks while bloody meat is attached to you is just insane. even more if you have no idea what you're doing. however, no matter the age, as long as the person is skilled enough and has the mental and physical capacity to control their actions doing whatever sport they put their mind to is all that matters.

yes.

explanation:

because it let the japanese know who had the upper hand in the war.