i need help with this question please help Mercy Otis Warren was able to write an article on her thoughts of the constitution despite being a non land owning, non educated female. Using her portrait in the book to infer, why do you think she was able to get her thoughts published even though she was not a land owning white male.

supplies had to travel a long distance across water on ships that were often attacked, so they did not reach europe

arresting and exicuting citizens

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

the han greatly expands the chinese empire. the han dynasty retains the centralized bureaucracy and unified political system of the qin but adopts and grafts upon this the confucian view that government should be run by educated, ethical men.

explanation: