subject
History, 26.04.2021 21:50 annamcveigh50

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?
A. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved
B. To understand how people felt during the period when the event happened
C. To see that event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
D. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:00
In a planned economy, which of the following does the job of market forces in order to determine the outcomes?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
Which of these works from the italian renaissance exhibits contrapposto?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
World war 2 was caused, in part, by which of these factors?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
When the novel made its first appearance in the 1700s, why did it appeal to people of all classes? people could identify with the stories of everyday life. people were entertained by reading about the lives of nobles. people preferred stories that were thoughtful, not full of action. people were excited to read about great historical figures.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a histori...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.02.2021 19:10
question
Mathematics, 26.02.2021 19:10
question
Mathematics, 26.02.2021 19:10
question
Mathematics, 26.02.2021 19:10
question
Health, 26.02.2021 19:10
Questions on the website: 13722367