subject
History, 23.04.2021 21:40 aashna66

In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), the Court ruled that symbolic speech, like wearing armbands as a form of protest, is . A.
protected by the First Amendment
B.
not protected by First Amendment
C.
protected by the First Amendment, except in the case of individuals younger than 21
D.
protected by the Second Amendment’s protection of the right to bear arm

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
Which factor best suggests a cause for the urban problems shown in this table? (3 points) increasing discriminatory housing practices shifting population density gradients over time declining urban renewal efforts by city governments declining basic employment sector in industrial cities increasing gentrification efforts in the inner cities
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
What former head of the cuban secret service was charged with protecting the country's prime minister for nearly 50 years?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:20
What is one result of the supreme courts decision in the mccullough v maryland case
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
In which ways did the durbar of 1877 mark a change for india? in which ways did india’s situation remain the same?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), the Court ruled th...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.01.2021 23:50
question
Mathematics, 28.01.2021 23:50
Questions on the website: 13722363