in what way did New Mexicans help pay for the war in Europe? a. planting victory gardens, b. buying liberty bonds, c. purchasing newspaper, d. listening to 4 minute men

i will need the answers to the problems. i took the test but cant remember the options. i would look up the questions that might .

for number 3, the answer is something about how they wanted to get sc to vote twords it, so they add the bill of rights or edited it.

for number 5, the answer is that it was even, they chose one side just as likely as they did the other.

the mandate of heaven or tian ming (chinese: 天命; pinyin: tiānmìng; wade–giles: t'ien-ming) is a chinese political and religious doctrine used since ancient times to justify the rule of the king or emperor of china. according to this belief, heaven (天, tian)—which embodies the natural order and will of the universe—bestows the mandate on a just ruler of china, the "son of heaven" of the "celestial empire". if a ruler was overthrown, this was interpreted as an indication that the ruler was unworthy, and had lost the mandate. it was also a common belief among citizens that natural disasters such as famine and flood were signs of heaven's displeasure with the ruler, so there would often be revolts following major disasters as citizens saw these as signs that the mandate of heaven had been withdrawn.[1]

a brief flow chart describing the dynastic cycles in imperial china on claiming to withdrawing the mandate of heaven

the mandate of heaven does not require a legitimate ruler to be of noble birth, depending instead on the just and able performance of the rulers and their heirs. dynasties such as the han and ming dynasties were founded by men of common origins. the concept is in some ways similar to the european concept of the divine right of kings; however, unlike the european concept, it does not in theory confer an unconditional right to rule, despite this being exactly the case in practicality. the mandate would in theory be a preoccupation in a ruler's lifetime, when he would hold onto the mandate and live according to heavens. intrinsic to the concept of the mandate of heaven was the right of rebellion against an unjust ruler. chinese historians interpreted a successful revolt as evidence that heaven had withdrawn its mandate from the ruler. throughout chinese history, times of poverty and natural disasters were often taken as signs that heaven considered the incumbent ruler unjust and thus in need of replacement. the mandate of heaven was often invoked by philosophers and scholars in china as a way to curtail the abuse of power by the ruler. while each dynasty was not the same, they each had a lineage that passed on the prospective ruler by order of generational descent or their priority of birth. many emperors during the imperial times would optimize to have many sons who could be candidates to fill the position after the current ruler has died. in addition heaven was thought to be of how a ruler's works and performance was, which reflected upon how favorable they would be to heaven.

nowadays there are things in our daily life that we are used to have. for example, cellphones or computers. basically, technology is something that we find   extremely necessary. but this are not the only example of technology in our lives. what about cars? we are so used to them that we never stop to think, what if we didn't have them? but, that is not the only fact to consider because, do we ever think about all the people that work so that we can have this technology? that is why , in this essay,i want to talk about ford's workers.

ford motor company is an american multinational automaker headquartered in dearborn, michigan, a suburb of detroit. it was founded by henry ford and incorporated on june 16, 1903. the company sells automobiles and commercial vehicles under the ford brand and most luxury cars under the lincoln brand. in 2008, ford produced 5.532 million automobiles[12] and employed about 213,000 employees at around 90 plants and facilities worldwide.

i think the best answer for this question is d. andrew jackson was very close to winning, but the u.s. house of representatives picked john quincy adams. they say there where 20 missing votes, which would have placed andrew jackson into the suspicious?

hope this ! : )