subject
History, 21.04.2021 21:20 Chipper4085

1. The German Reich Chancellor rejected Wolff-Metternich's proposal, saying that "public reprimand of an ally in the course of a war would be an act which is unprecedented in history." Compare the way the Reich
Chancellor framed his universe of obligation with the way that Wolff-Metternich constructed his. What
differences do you find most striking?
2. Does this response surprise you, if so please elaborate on why? How might this hands off attitude lead to
unresolved conflict?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:40
What was the most common destination for african american migrants between 1910 and 1930
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:50
What happened 10 million years ago? if u answer, u get 50 ! plz answer ; -;
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
This map is depicting the 16th century route of what explorer
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Why were presidents andrew jackson and martin van buren unwilling to annex texas? a. they did not want texas to be admitted to the union as a slave state. b. they feared that the annexation of texas as a slave state would lead to political problems within the union. c. they thought that texas was too large to be admitted to the union as one state. d. they did not believe in the idea of manifest destiny.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
1. The German Reich Chancellor rejected Wolff-Metternich's proposal, saying that "public reprimand o...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.04.2020 01:57
question
History, 25.04.2020 01:57
question
Social Studies, 25.04.2020 01:57
Questions on the website: 13722367