subject
History, 31.12.2019 21:31 24kfjkasklfjl

1.the pretended power of suspending the laws and dispensing with laws by regal authority without consent of parliament is illegal;
2.the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of parliament;
3.by assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws and the execution of laws without consent of parliament;
4.by levying taxes for the use of the crown by pretence of prerogative as if the same was granted by parliament;

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 18:30
Why did the united states become involved in the soviet-afghan war? the united states wanted access to the afghan oil fields. the united states wanted to retaliate against the soviet boycott of the 1984 olympics in los angeles. representative charlie wilson convinced congress to fund afghan resistance to soviet influence. president ronald reagan wanted to force the soviets to withdraw from afghanistan.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
How did the supreme court decision in the slaughterhouse cause have an affect american business
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
How does the existence of a site like catus hill demonstrate the challenge that archaeologist face when making theories?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:50
What are the expressed and implied powers of the president
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
1.the pretended power of suspending the laws and dispensing with laws by regal authority without con...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 29.01.2020 01:57
question
Mathematics, 29.01.2020 01:57
question
Mathematics, 29.01.2020 01:57
question
Mathematics, 29.01.2020 01:57
Questions on the website: 13722363