Do the historians in the article generally agree or disagree with one another about the causes and legacy of the civil war? what does this agreement or disagreement tell us about the reliability and validity of their views?

The historians cited in the article all agree with one another about the cause of the Civil War. Despite coming from different backgrounds and cultures, the historians agree that slavery was the root cause of the Civil War. The fact that all these historians generally agree with one another makes their shared viewpoints more reliable and valid, especially because the historians have different backgrounds and all work for the well-respected institutions of Howard University, Clemson University, and the University of Colorado.

btw. i know you probably dont need this info anymore but for everyone on edmentum, here ya go!

hehe hehe hehe he he hehe hehe hehe hehe

answer: both considered peasants valued members of society.

explanation: the ancient chinese and indian empires were large asian empires that had the same problems with other big empires, they had to work hard and sometimes fight in order to keep them united, they both relied heavily on their capacity to trade and to send strange and rare items to europe, and had the father as the head of the house hold in both societies, but they didn´t considered pleasants as valued members of their society, they were the bottom of the social pyramid in both of their societies.