subject
History, 08.10.2019 13:30 lilswetheart2007

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?

a. to hear about the event from someone who was directly involved

b. to learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event

c. to see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it

d. to understand how people felt during the period when the event happened

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:00
How did nationalism motivate italy's unification? the italian people wanted to return to a pre-napoleon ancien régime. the italian people wanted a republic nation free from austrian rule. the italian people wanted to instigate industrialization in italy. the italian people wanted to lead europe into the modern age.
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:30
The revolutions in latin america in the 19th century resulted in political independence from europe the end of slavery in each country the establishment of stable democracies social and economic equality for all
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:20
Arguments supporting and opposing the supreme court decision citizens united v. federal election commission identify two reasons why some supporters of the decision consider it a victory for free speech.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
Which of these did the soviet union do in 1961? it built a wall through berlin to keep people from moving to the west. it used force to destroy a wall the united states had built in berlin. it convinced the british and french to merge their zones in berlin with the soviet zone. it threatened to bomb berlin if the united states did not leave within 30 days.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historica...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 02.07.2019 15:30
question
Mathematics, 02.07.2019 15:30
Questions on the website: 13722360