How was the portuguese colonial experience in africa in the 1520s different from that od the dutch in the 1650s

The options of the question are:

A. Both countries' colonists were entirely welcomed by the Africans.

B. Both countries' colonists were met with resistance from Africans.

C. Both countries' colonists were avoided completely by the Africans.

D. Both countries' colonists were soundly defeated by African armies.

The correct answer is B) Both countries' colonists were met with resistance from Africans.

The Portuguese colonial experience in Africa in the 1520s was similar to that of the Dutch in the 1650s because both countries' colonists were met with resistance from Africans.

The Portuguese and the Dutch had expansionist motivations when they arrived in Africa. Both nations had their own military, political, and trade agenda. But when Portugal and Dutchland wanted to colonize Africa, the African people seriously opposed in violent and non-violent ways. The colonial experience for the Portuguese and the Dutch was complicated and not as fast as they thought.  

when a country suffers, for example, a drought period, the market product is affected for a low offer, in this case, potatoes; the government has to tax to the households, which have to give more money for the potatoes which they consume, that situation make them consume substitute goods even through loans, it could increase the financial market movement and the inflationary phenomena, the business has to increase salaries in order to the employees could buy a more expensive food (potatoes) and in order to inflation tha business had to buy expensive supplies in the factor market, while the rest of the world have to gain more money to consume the same amount of potatoes.

where is the subject? hahahaha