According to anti-federalists, the constitution..
a would make the president too weak.
b could make the president less powerful than congress.
c could give the president too much influence.
d would make the president work closely with states.

The correct answer is C could give the president too much influence.

The Anti-federalists, lead by individuals such as Thomas Jefferson, were worried about the new constitution because they felt it gave too much power to the federal government. This fear of a strong federal government lead by one individual was based on America's experience as colonists under the control of Great Britain and King George III. This is why the Anti-federalists tried to limit the power of the president as much as possible. This is why the Anti-federalists were also in favor of a Bill of Rights, as this type of document would explicit state what rights citizens possessed in American society.

According to Anti-Federalists, the Constitution would make the president work closely with states. Numerous Anti-Federalists favored a limited central government because they compared powerful management with British tyranny. Others needed to strengthen self-government and trembled strong management that would be controlled by the prosperous. They felt that the states were furnishing up too much potential to the current federal government.

Further Explanation

In the sanction deliberation, the Anti-Federalists argued to the making up of Constitution. They criticized that the new system endangered permissions, and disappointed to preserve personal rights. The Anti-Federalists weren't specifically a unified group but alternatively included many components.

One side rejected the Constitution because they believed more competent administration jeopardized the independence of the states. Others demonstrated that a unique centralized administration would have all the elements of the hegemony of Great Britain they had strived so hard to remove themselves from. And still, others apprehended that the new administration frightened their independence.

During the pressure for ratification, many of the provisions in opposition were formulated under pseudonyms, but some prominent reformist such as Patrick Henry came out openly opposed to the Constitution.

Learn more:

1. In fur man v. Georgia (1972), the supreme court ruled in William fur man’s favor, saying that Georgia had?

2. For prior restraint to apply, what must the government prove about the speech in question?

Answer Details

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Na

Keywords : Sanction , deliberation , constitution , administration , opposition , elements , hegemony , prominent , constitution , ratification , Anti-federalist.

answer: born in saint-dié, in the vosges department, france, he studied law, and was called to the bar at paris in 1854,[2] but soon went into politics, contributing to various newspapers, particularly to le temps. he attacked the second french empire with great violence, directing his opposition especially against baron haussmann, prefect of the seine department. a series of his articles in le temps was later republished as the fantastic tales of haussmannlaxupa (1868).[2]

explanation: