Was the pueblo lands act for or against native american rights? describe
and explain a little about the law to support your position.

The Pueblo land was pro-Indian. The act was made to allow Native Americans to claim the lands that are rightfully theirs. However, there were certain issues that were not addressed immediately.  The Pueblo Lands were supposed to be given to Native Americans but because of the claim made in 1912, the lands were being sold to non-native Americans.

I agree that the board should find a way to distinguish which land belongs to native Americans and which lands belong to the federal governmentThe Pueblo land was pro-Indian. The act was made to allow Native Americans to claim the lands that are rightfully theirs. However, there were certain issues that were not addressed immediately.  The Pueblo Lands were supposed to be given to Native Americans but because of the claim made in 1912, the lands were being sold to non-native Americans.

I agree that the board should find a way to distinguish which land belongs to Native Americans and which lands belong to the federal government. In that way, both parties can distinguish which of these lands belong to them and that the boundaries should be clearly stated to avoid conflict on both ends.

well first we can compare on what the slave masters ate and what the slaves ate well the masters ate fancy great food like chicken rice mash potatose and stuff like that and slaves ate well food that your not suppost to eat like the weird parts of turkey and chicken and slaves master chilled beat and eat and slaves work get beat and get little of sleep there you go