What lesson or moral can be learn from sir andrew's subplot? (the twelfth night)
i really need this !

a. don't think too much of yourself.
b. always weigh your decisions carefully.
c. don't trust your friends, especially if they drink.
d. don't fall in love with wealthy women.
i also want a good explanation of why any of the answers are correct or wrong.

Option A.

Explanation:

The lesson or moral that can be learn from Sir Andrew's subplot from the "Twelfth Night" would be not to think too much of yourself.

Sir Andrew Aguecheek,  is a minor character of the play written by Shakespeare who attempts to court  the character of Olivia and who is the representation of the ultimate fool. As his subplot develops, his characters does not, as he believes he is witty, brave and possesses great skills, when in reality he is an actual fool. The moral lesson that his characters brings to the play is the idea to not think too much of yourself, because it will probably make you somewhat delusional of your whole persona and the flaws you posses.

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.

answer: both considered peasants valued members of society.

explanation: the ancient chinese and indian empires were large asian empires that had the same problems with other big empires, they had to work hard and sometimes fight in order to keep them united, they both relied heavily on their capacity to trade and to send strange and rare items to europe, and had the father as the head of the house hold in both societies, but they didn´t considered pleasants as valued members of their society, they were the bottom of the social pyramid in both of their societies.