How does dr. king establish his authority and the credibility of the claims in his “i have a dream” speech? he argues that discrimination and segregation are unreasonable. he alludes to revered texts like the declaration of independence, the bible, and the gettysburg address. he appeals to the emotional connection listeners have to the welfare and happiness of their children. he uses a parallel structure and repetition throughout the speech.

He alludes to revered texts like the Declaration of Independence, the Bible, and the Gettysburg Address.

Explanation:

One of the methods that Dr. King employs to establish his authority and credibility is referring to various well-known and respected documents such as the Declaration of Independence, the Bible, and the Gettysburg Address. Dr. King wants to show to the listeners that the ideas that he is proposing are not new or unusual. In fact, the values of liberty, equality and brotherhood have already been discussed by people with more authority or knowledge than him. His aim is only to reconcile what Americans believe their country is like to what their country actually is.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

the communist manifesto is an 1848 political pamphlet by the german near the end of the manifesto, the authors call for a "forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions",  ..