How did the miners settle the west? they provided gold for everyone, including those they traveled with. as they mined, they stayed and settled towns. they did nothing special. in order to financially with mining, they herded cattle on the land. during their breaks from mining the land, they build railroads.

Miners helped settle the west by staying and settling towns as they mined.

During the mining fever, which began in 1849, human settlements known as boomtowns began to appear with some speed. The cattle towns, for example, were the destination of the routes for the dispatch of the herd to large cities, and also home to activities related to livestock. In the railroad lines cities arose in each station. There were large metropolises that housed flourishing industries or important financial centers. All this development led to the appearance of lodgings, saloons, gambling houses and brothels.

Many of these settlements were abandoned when their reason for being ceased. The mining localities also caused serious ecological damage by installing hydraulic systems that devastated the natural resources of the area.

In the west, cities that rivaled the large settlements of Chicago and New York in the east started to grow. Such is the case of San Luis, which was the second most important port in the middle of the century, and the starting point of various routes to the Pacific coast. The history of San Luis runs parallel to the golden age of the steamboat of the Mississippi River. San Francisco, on the other hand, was a major industrial, commercial and financial center, with important logging, mining and railroad companies making it its headquarters, becoming the most prominent city west of the Rocky Mountains.

pacal the great: the throne was passed on to pacal through a female; as a result, he believed that he must legitimize his claim to the throne to add stability to his reign.

as a result, the daughter of ac kan's brother ruled until her son, pacal, reached an age old enough to assume the throne.

pacal the great became the king of the mayan city of palenque in a different way than most mayan kings.

pacal pointed out that ac kan had succeeded his mother as ruler, thereby establishing a precedent for the rule to pass through a female.  

he tried to justify that the way he gained the throne by connecting his mother with the divine mother and the mythological events that happened during the creation of the world.  

typically, the son of a male mayan ruler inherited the throne, but in 612 ce, king ac kan died and did not leave behind a male heir.

montezuma 1: even so, these wars of conquest failed to provide enough human sacrifices and because of this, he formed a triple alliance with cities in the valley of puebla-tlascala.  

in addition, montezuma realized that his government failed to the aztecs during the famine.

in order to appease him, montezuma increased the number of human sacrifices.

the aztec performed human sacrifices to their god huitzilopotchli because they believed he desired human blood.  

around 1440 ce, montezuma i became the fifth emperor of the aztecs and went on to rule for 28 years.  

soon after he assumed the throne, the aztecs were hit with a series of disasters, namely a plague of locusts, a flood, and a harsh frost  

huayna capac: huayna capac also fought to gain territories north of his empire in what is now ecuador.  

huayna capac significantly extended the inca empire to the south, into what is now argentina and chile.  

in 1493 ce, huayna capac became the eleventh ruler of the inca empire.  

huayna, therefore, wanted to gain his own lands and launched campaigns against tribes to the east and north of the empire.  

the inca empire reached its peak under the rule of huayna capac.

during this time the empire covered a vast territory including parts of present day colombia, peru, argentina, chile, bolivia, and ecuador.

during his reign, huayna heard about bearded men with pale skin that resembled the incan1 god viracocha and took this news as a bad omen.

huayna took this as another bad omen that predicted the destruction of the empire.

answer: capitalism and socialism are formal economies. the major differences between capitalism and socialism revolve around the role of the government and equality of economics. capitalism affords economic freedom, consumer choice, and economic growth.

read more on -

explanation: