subject
History, 31.01.2020 11:59 daltonbrown4

In 1832, the united states supreme court ruled in worcester v. georgia that the state of georgia had no right to force the cherokee from their native lands. why did this ruling have little positive effect? georgia had no interest in cherokee lands. president jackson did not enforce the ruling. the cherokee nation chose to move to canada. the trail of tears had already occurred.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 13:50
Which scenario best illustrates a violation of procedural due process? plz
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Can you summarize this? it takes time and caution to perfect anything which must be concealed. it takes time to crush men who are pursuing legitimate trade. but one of mr. rockefeller’s most impressive characteristics is patience. there never was a more patient man, or one who could dare more while he waited. the folly of hurrying, the folly of discouragement, for one who would succeed, went hand in hand. everything must be ready before he acted, but while you wait you must prepare, must think, work. "you must put in, if you would take out." his instinct for the money opportunity in things was amazing, his perception of the value of seizing this or that particular invention, plant, market, was unerring.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
(easy 35 ) i am a confederate general during the civil war. who am i? 1. ulysses s. grant 2. robert e. lee 3. george mcclellan 4. winfield scott
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
In atleast 150 words evaluate the effectiveness of the presidential election process in the united states
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In 1832, the united states supreme court ruled in worcester v. georgia that the state of georgia had...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 27.05.2020 02:06
question
SAT, 27.05.2020 02:06
question
Mathematics, 27.05.2020 02:06
question
Spanish, 27.05.2020 02:06
Questions on the website: 13722367