Why were party leaders shocked by krushchev’s rejection of stalin?

stalin had kept everyone safe for a long time.
stalin had expanded soviet rule over many countries.
the party had grown accustomed to stalin’s decisions.
the party believed that stalin was a noble leader.

The Party leaders were shocked by Krushchev’s rejection of Stalin because they believed that Stalin was a noble leader.

Krushchev’s speech, made to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was highly shocking at its day because it was very critical about the government led by his predecessor, Joseph Stalin. In this “secret speech”, as it was known, Krushchev criticized the purges led by Stalin in which millions of people as well as party members were killed. He also pointed that Stalin fostered his leadership as a “cult of personality”. The response at the speech was of complete astonishment between party members who have long revered the figure of Stalin as the greatest leader of the Soviet Union. Moreover, the speech drew criticism from other communist regimes such as China and Albania, which condemned Krushchev as a revisionist and broke off relationship with his government.    

D. The party believed that Stalin was a noble leader.

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation:

it is relaxation hope this