subject
History, 13.12.2019 04:31 hermesrobles

In schmerber v. california, the court said that a search warrant was not necessary because
a. the suspect’s blood was drawn in a safe way
b. the rights of the individual take precedence over public safety
c. the officer did not have time to secure a warrant
d. the suspect’s privacy rights cannot be violated

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 01:20
The vocabulary word meaning causing destruction isrevenueruinousrepair
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:50
Which statements describe how reformers fought for social change in the progressive era? check all that apply. 1. they founded a state university to promote industrialization. 2. they began a civil rights movement to promote equality between races. 3. they made it legal to manufacture and sell alcohol. 4. they built thousands of new schools and required attendance. 5. they promoted abstinence from alcohol and supported prohibition.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Ineed a example for this test plz reflect on your decisions in the cases of hazelwood v. kuhlmeier and t.m. v. state of florida using the following questions: did your opinion reflect the majority or minority opinion on each case? did you tend to favor loose or strict interpretation of the laws and rights for each case? what factors most influenced your decision and interpretations in each cas
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
Nazi germany practiced this form of nationalism. cultural religious ethnic political
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In schmerber v. california, the court said that a search warrant was not necessary because
a....
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722361