What best describes the impact of people changing from hunter-gatherers to living in permanent agricultural societies?

a.)hunter-gatherers relied on a narrower variety of foods compared to grain producing agricultural societies.

b.) hunter-gatherers made little impact on the land versus “slash and burn” techniques used by agricultural societies.

c.) hunter-gatherers domesticated more animals during the winter months compared to agricultural societies.

d.) hunter-gatherers endangered many species due to overkilling compared to agricultural societies.

B.) Hunter-gatherers made little impact on the land versus “slash and burn” techniques used by agricultural societies.

Explanation:

Although not all civilizations used the "slash and burn" method, it is fair to say that in general, hunter-gatherers made little impact on the land when compared to agricultural societies. Hunter-gatherers could only use the resources that were naturally present in an area. If these were exhausted, they had to relocate. This gave nature the change to recover before more people came again. In this way, the balance of life was maintained and very little impact on the environment was made by humans.

religion was the center of there society they practiced human sacrifices and which they believed kept there god strong and that he would keep bad guys away hope this

the name of the theory is landmass theory.