Read the excerpt from the state constitution of arkansas, which was adopted in 1874.

no person who may hereafter fight a duel, assist in the same as second, or send, accept, or knowingly carry a challenge therefor, shall hold any office in the state, for a period of ten
-arkansas state constitution, article 19, section

how would a rule like this most likely be interpreted by someone interested in state constitutional reform?
a. this rule would be seen as a fundamental law of lasting importance that should not be changed.
b. this rule would be seen as a statutory law that the state legislature should pass but not put in the constitution.
c. this rule would be seen as a miscellaneous provision that no longer has any practical effect and does not need to be in the constitution.
d. this rule would be seen as a preamble that has no legal force and could remain in the document to explain the constitution's purpose.