Which best describes why the sizes of farms in new england were different from farms in the southern colonies?

a)in new england, the soil was rich, the land was flat, and the growing season was long, so the farms were bigger than in the southern colonies.

b)in new england, the soil was poor, the land was hilly, and the growing season was short, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies.

c) in new england, the soil was rich, the land was covered in forests, and the growing season was short, so the farms were bigger than in the southern colonies.

d) in new england, the soil was poor, the rivers were distant, and the growing season was long, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies.

b) In New England, the soil was poor, the land was hilly, and the growing season was short, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies.

Explanation:

This is the statement that best describes the reason why the farms in New England were smaller than those in the Southern colonies. In New England, the conditions of the environment were not as well-suited to agriculture as those in the South. As the two areas developed, this led to the South focusing on agriculture heavily, while the North was able to develop more varied industries.

the main inference that can be drawn from jean jacques rousseau's book the social contract is: a. people can enjoy civil and physical freedom, even if it sometimes harms society.

which colony was founded, in part, as a place for english debtors?

a) georgia