Which difficult position might historians find themselves in?

a) wanting to disguise the truth they have uncovered
b) wanting to add their own perspective or bias to the writing
c) wanting to embellish stories and events
d) wanting to omit boring passages of historic records

The correct answer is B. Wanting to add their own perspective or bias to the writing

Explanation:

Historians are the people who study the history of human and even all history before human existence, for doing this most historians study artifacts and other elements of the past and later report their finding in writing that describe the way events could have taken place during a specific age or related to a specific event in the past. Considering the writings of historians are based on artifacts from the past and the interpretation of those artifacts or elements, historians can find difficulties in avoiding their own preferences, opinions and preconceptions have an influence on the interpretation of evidence and the process of writing, as they can omit certain parts of the evidence, mistranslate documents or change the evidence, providing a bias writing instead of a writing that reports the evidence in an objective way. Thus, one difficult position historians can find themselves in is wanting to add their own perspective or bias to the writing as their opinions, ideas, expectations, and preconceptions can influence the work of the historian and lead to non-objective writings.

number   5 i know this because savannah was the first capital and i took the test and all you have to do is look up a map of georgia savannah.

the constitution gives congress the power to regulate commerce "among" the several states.