In the supreme court case loving v virginia a law that banned interracial marriage was declared unconstitutional.

which of the following reasons explain why judicial interpretations, such as loving, change over time? (2 answers)

ideologies of the justices
evolving attitudes
threat of impeachment
citizen petitions

In the Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia a law that banned interracial marriage was declared unconstitutional. Judicial interpretations changed as a result of change in the ideologies of the justices, and citizen petitions of equality between white and black people.

The case Loving v, Virginia was a judicial case on civil rights, brought before the Supreme Court of the United States, which in its judgment established jurisprudence invalidating the laws that prohibited interracial marriage in the United States.

In the case, Mildred Loving, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, had been sentenced to one year in jail in Virginia for marrying. Their marriage violated the anti-miscegenation laws of the State, the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which prohibited all marriage between persons classified as "white" with persons classified as "colored". The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that such a ban was unconstitutional, reversing the ruling in Pace v. Alabama (1883) and ending all legal restrictions on marriage based on race in the country.

The ruling caused an increase in interracial marriages in the United States and is commemorated annually every June 12 with the Loving Day.

answer; (a) he was a u.s senator for 38 years;

the correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be option b. expanding civil services. diocletian and constantine paved the way for foreign invasion by dividing the empire, creating administrative bureaucracies and reorganizing the military, except for expanding civil services. hope this answer .

click to let others know, how is it

explanation: