subject
History, 04.02.2020 06:04 zoeybuch5

In hamdan v. rumsfeld, the supreme court ruled that trial by military commission for the detainees went against the uniform code of military justice and the geneva conventions and a. could only be allowed if congress authorized it. b. would be allowable under no circumstances. c. only the united states president could sanction it. d. should only occur during an official war.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
34. in 2009, impaired drivers killed 154 a. child passengers of vehicles b. other motorists c. pedestrians d. none of the above
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:00
Name 3 significant impacts of the tet offensive on the outcome of the war, it's participants, or the public image of the war.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
The letter explains the treatment of prisoners of war. of 3.6 million prisoners of war, only several hundred thousand are still able to work fully. a large part of them has starved, or died, because of the hazards of the weather. . the camp commanders have forbidden the civilian population to put food at the disposal of the prisoners, and they have rather let them starve to death. –letter to defendant wilhelm keitel from alfred rosenberg the letter prosecutors at the nuremberg trials prove that soviet prisoners were a) treated well despite the conditions. b) treated poorly. c) subject to execution. d) subject to crimes against peace.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
Can you describe the american army in 1812?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In hamdan v. rumsfeld, the supreme court ruled that trial by military commission for the detainees w...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363