What were the two main reasons that the british granted independence to india? a: gandhi’s campaign gained attention from governments worldwide.
b: gandhi convinced the british government to free india with his nonviolent peace talks.
c: world war ii had depleted the resources of the british empire, making it economically unstable.
d: the amritsar massacre caused an international uproar and forced the british out if india.
e: the success of the sepoy rebellion had greatly shaken the foundations of the british empire in india.

C. World War II had depleted the resources of the British Empire, making it economically unstable.

B: Gandhi convinced the British government to free India with his nonviolent peace talks.  

Explanation:

WWII gravely sapped the quality of the United Kingdom. This left it without the assets it may have expected to keep up sway over India. It likewise set the United States in place to lead the non-socialist world, which made a difference in light of the fact that the US didn't by and large endorse of imperialism. Along these lines, WWII seriously debilitated Britain's capacity to hold India.  

The more essential of these reasons was the long ascent of Indian resistance from being colonized. Starting with the formation of the Indian National Congress in 1885, there was a sorted out development to diminish British power and, in the long run, to convey freedom to India.

The Indian elites were regularly taught in England and benefited not see at all reason that Indians ought not have more power at home. They pushed emphatically for more noteworthy self-government and, in the long run, for independence. The most acclaimed figure in this development was Mahatma Gandhi. His different protests movements against the British undermined the authenticity of British rule and to pick up support for Indian independence.

the correct answer is “opportunity cost”. opportunity cost is what a company misses out because it decided in one option over another one. in this case, the company decided to invest in building a factory so it gave up another possible benefit or profit in order to achieve success with the factory.  

trade-off is not the correct answer since it is a situation in which you accept losing something in return for benefits in other areas.

and finally, consequence is a general term used to accept what it comes when you make a decision. it can be a positive or negative consequence depending if the decision you took was the correct one.  

he believed that congress would be better not dealing with "lobbyists", or people who seek to influence (a politician or public official) on an issue, since historically, they had problems with these kinds of people. he thought lobbying produces benefits, but should be carefully monitored.