After world war i, how did former ottoman territories differ from former austro-hungarian territories?

a. ottoman territories could establish democracies, but austro-hungarian territories had to keep their existing monarchies.
b. ottoman territories were allowed to practice different religions, but austro-hungarian territories were required to convert to christianity.
c. ottoman territories were forced to pay fines for damages during the war, but austro-hungarian territories were not punished in any way.
d. ottoman territories came under the control of allied powers, but austro-hungarian territories gained the ability to establish their own governments.

D. Ottoman territories came under the control of Allied powers, but Austro-Hungarian territories gained the ability to establish their own governments

is still a valid answer as of Apex Nov 2018

social contract theory basically says that all individuals are born equal, and provided a god given right to consent to be governed. american government is based of this

thomas hobbes and john locke said that we are selfish, individualistic, and constantly at war with each other, therefore we need to be controlled. 

government is defined as the legitimate use of force to control human behavior within territorial boundaries, here comes in hobbes and locke.

hobbes takes the part about controlling human behavior. while locke takes the part of legitimate use of force, since force is not legitimate unless there is consent of the people. 

there are basically 3 goals of the government: 1) maintain order by protecting life and property. 2) providing public goods, those which are typically not provided by the public sector, such as roads and education. 3) promote equality be it political, opportunist or outcome equality.