What were three weaknesses of non-european regions that allowed european powers to control or colonize them?
a. they did not have the most advanced military equipment.
b. they were small nations with small populations.
c. there was a lack of unity among members of various groups.
d. they were resigned to the fate of being ruled by foreigners.
e. they were weakened by trade restrictions and blockades.

I believe the answer is:

A.They did not have the most advanced military equipment.

C.There was a lack of unity among members of various groups.

E.They were weakened by trade restrictions and blockades

The difference in millitary equipment made the colonised country unable to defend themselves in the face of Europeans threat

. When this happen, some people decided to surrender to the European while some of them decided to fight, which divide the unity among them. Not only that, if the majority of people refuse to follow the colony, they would be given with restrictions and blockades which hurt their economy.

Non-European regions are the countries, which are not controlled by the European authorities. However, their weaknesses made the Europeans control and colonize them.

The correct answer is:

Option A. They did not have the most advanced military equipment.

Option C. There was a lack of unity among members of various groups.

Option E. They were weakened by trade restrictions and blockades.

The inefficient military and equipment made the colonized country unable to defend themselves in European threat.

Some of the non-European regions decided to fight, while some surrendered to the European authorities. This led to the division of unity amongst them.

Thus, the majority of the populace refuse to follow the colony, and they would be given restrictions and blockades which hurt their economy.

To know more about non-European regions, refer to the following link:

link

answer: if you like this comment you are my freind

explanation:

i'll write a docs for you. hold on for a moment