Ireally need !

president lincoln did not include union border states in the emancipation proclamation because he wanted to ?

the union recruit african-american soldiers.
encourage southern states to surrender.
keep the border states loyal to the union.
stop the underground railroad.

president lincoln thought the emancipation proclamation could the north win the war because it

ended british and french support for the south.
exposed the south's rationale for war.
freed all enslaved people in the united states.
gained support from abolitionists.

Question #1

Question #2

Context/explanation:

While Lincoln personally was strongly against slavery, he had to tread carefully in his role as president and commander-in-chief.  As The History Channel points out, Lincoln was "worried about the support of the four border slave states."  Those border states, which remained in the Union though they were states that permitted slavery, were  Maryland, Missouri, Delaware, and Kentucky.   Lincoln wanted to keep those states loyal to the Union cause.

According to the American Battlefield Trust, "Britain and France had considered supporting the Confederacy in order to expand their influence in the Western Hemisphere. However, many Europeans were against slavery." So making the war to preserve the Union specifically also about slavery was a way of blocking British and French involvement.  Britain had abolished slavery in its territories in 1833.  France had put a final end to slavery in its territories in 1848.  So when Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, it also served as a foreign policy action to keep European powers out of the US Civil War, according to Steve Jones, professor of history at Southwestern Adventist University.

Keep the border states loyal to the Union.  

Explanation:  The four border states still allowed slavery but the President did not include them in the proclamation because he needed them to stay loyal to the Union.

answer: because they get bored or smth idk

he believed that congress would be better not dealing with "lobbyists", or people who seek to influence (a politician or public official) on an issue, since historically, they had problems with these kinds of people. he thought lobbying produces benefits, but should be carefully monitored.